The Game I just lost the Game.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_%28mind_game%29
The object of the Game of course, is not to think of the Game. Once you think about it, you have to say it out loud to at least one person, but you can say it to everyone around. There's anywhere between 30 second and 30 minutes where you can talk about the Game as much as you want, a "Grace period" in order to reset the Game, but this period changes from people to people.
One time I went to my philosophy of knowledge (epistemology) professor Dr. John Carroll. I told him about the Game, and he said, "Well, then I've been playing for a long time."
The funny part of this is that he wasn't joking in the least (contradiction much?).
I play another version of this, at least what I consider another version of this, as outlined by Eckart Tolle in his New Age-Spirituality (Eastern Philosophy?) book A New Earth.
Tolle recommends considering, "What will I think next?" as a way of getting a hold on the stream of consciousness.
So the way that I play this with myself is, "I wonder what I'm going to think of next." And then I wait. Then I have a thought that's really funny like, "This is a thought."
Another strange thing happened: I realized after playing Tolle's version of the Game, that a great deal of my thoughts are so reactionary to what is going on. The mind flow stream is influxed and injected with all sorts of stuff going on that is outside of the mindstream.
Another interesting thing that happens when you pay attention to your thoughts is you start to notice the evolution of thoughts within yourself. So a couple of weeks ago, if I were thinking about hamburgers, that might come up in conversation this week, seemingly "randomly." (I wrote a bit on the philosophy of entropy on this Blog a while back).
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(276)
-
▼
November
(49)
- The Objective-Subjective Nexus Infects Us
- See? I told you Sarah Palin was like Lady Gaga!
- A moral question: happiness or maximized utility?
- Habits, Consciousness, Poetry, and streaming consc...
- Truth Musings
- Lady Gaga, Sarah Palin, and the Lovable Exorcism o...
- In Groups and Out Groups
- More on the Ascetic Life
- Diogenes, various philosophers, and the Ascetic Life
- Essay One for Hi 264
- Feuerbach Paper 11-19
- More Recapping!
- Thinking about Thinking and Thinking Pleasant Thou...
- Things to think about
- Goldschneider's Path for me
- Portfolio 23: Use the Wolfprowl for the Technicia...
- Some notes on writing
- The first outraged response (is really just lukewa...
- "That which doesn't kill us only makes us stronger...
- "Pop's Most pretentious Starlet" Article from Slate
- Wray Herbert's Why We Procrastinate and how to Stop
- GSYBE's Moya
- Some thoughts on thought terminating cliche's
- Thought Terminating Cliche
- Critique Impure Reasoning
- Some of the SKS speaker's pros and cons
- Self-Knowledge Symposium meeting tonight
- Portfolio 20 or 21: Sex and Individuality
- Portfolio 23: The Story of DH Hill and Me
- Thoughts on purpose
- Performative Contradiction
- The Weakerthans song: "Aside"
- Is this an existential Presidency?
- "Poverty Porn" and Some thoughts; especially in l...
- Some morning routine
- I didn't see it coming. Buffett is pretty cool a...
- Portfolio 22: Studying for Life Purpose
- Against Pretense = Facadesaside
- Some Aretha Franklin: Don't play that song for me...
- 4 Brand Spanking new fields for Philosophy
- Some Concrete Definitions of Philosophy
- Some correspondence with Rick
- Sometimes when people want me to do an option, the...
- Notes on Scandal 3, "Deserving it" 2
- Some more postmodernism
- Notes on a Scandal Part 2
- Notes on a scandal
- When you do something for a while and then it turn...
- Consider It Considerate
-
▼
November
(49)
No comments:
Post a Comment