I'm absolutely fascinated by motivation. What motivates me to be fascinated by motivation? I like the idea of power surrounding it.
Je te presente The Philosophical Law of Identity.
The Law of Identity states we can identify something; and substitute it in later. This is cooler than it sounds.
The Law of Identity gets expressed basically as x = x, or other inane obvious ways. But this stuff is more subtle and interesting than that.
Check out this philosophical classic by Bertrand Russell:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Denoting
If I told you that gravity is bodies being attracted to a larger body; and that bodies being attracted to a larger body is gravity; You would say, "Bum rap! That's a terrible answer!"
But in order to give any truthful answer ever, you would have to have an answer that is a true proposition. I know this could be explained better but I'm going to let you chew on that.
And sometimes it can be good to identify something as is. There is some strength in saying an apple = an apple; or x = x
The Law of Identity is closely related to, and this is going to sound heartbreakingly obvious, The Law of Substitution.
For example, in a basic informal proof, we could say that x = (y+z). Then every time we have an x, we can get y+z. This is akin to the point in the Harry Potter movies where he learns to raise his wand and turn an apple into a goat. But even cooler!
The big guy for all of this, again, is Gottfried Leibniz.
Aristotle's big three Logic laws were:
Law of Contradiction (Never P and not P)
Law of Identity (P = P)
Law of Excluded Middle (P or not P)
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(276)
-
▼
December
(23)
- Facadesaside has moved
- Be Free Now
- Wikipedia tells you what truth is: will you liste...
- Existentialism's Demon
- Some Useful Tautologies
- Discussing the Last Post's Article
- Barack "False Choices" Obama
- Pragmatism entails Traditionalism?
- More on the Philosophy of the Zodiac (Round 2)
- Hope and Change: The Placebo, the American Humbug...
- Philosophies of the Zodiac
- Beginnings and the Cosmological Argument
- Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Motivation
- Comic Book Philosophy (Part 3)
- It's impossible
- German Idealists: Georg Hegel
- David Denby's Past Shock
- Thing about Baby Logic
- The Law of Identity and the Law of Substitution
- You look good to me by Oscar Peterson
- Operational Definition of Philosophy, and some pro...
- Slate: Rosenbaum on how we haven't solved 3 big m...
- Some more Philosphical Musings
-
►
November
(49)
- The Objective-Subjective Nexus Infects Us
- See? I told you Sarah Palin was like Lady Gaga!
- A moral question: happiness or maximized utility?...
- Habits, Consciousness, Poetry, and streaming consc...
- Truth Musings
- Lady Gaga, Sarah Palin, and the Lovable Exorcism o...
- In Groups and Out Groups
- More on the Ascetic Life
- Diogenes, various philosophers, and the Ascetic Li...
- Essay One for Hi 264
- Feuerbach Paper 11-19
- More Recapping!
- Thinking about Thinking and Thinking Pleasant Thou...
- Things to think about
- Goldschneider's Path for me
- Portfolio 23: Use the Wolfprowl for the Technicia...
- Some notes on writing
- The first outraged response (is really just lukewa...
- "That which doesn't kill us only makes us stronger...
- "Pop's Most pretentious Starlet" Article from Slat...
- Wray Herbert's Why We Procrastinate and how to Sto...
- GSYBE's Moya
- Some thoughts on thought terminating cliche's
- Thought Terminating Cliche
- Critique Impure Reasoning
- Some of the SKS speaker's pros and cons
- Self-Knowledge Symposium meeting tonight
-
▼
December
(23)
0 comments:
Post a Comment