Brute fact empiricism trumps ethics, sometimes at least.
I mean, that's what we could get down to with regimented utilitarian analyses in at least some cases.
This is part of the reason that Socrates said that people who knew what was truly good would not choose wrong. He sees the choices between good and bad as just ignorant.
Flagging this objective world for a second, isn't it obvious what we would do if we had that kind of knowledge?
If we knew that helium causes brain damage, would you still breathe in a helium balloon?
This seems remarkably similar to drug education. (Which sometimes works? I mean, the D.A.R.E. programs have been wiped out; were these worthless? do kids not learn like we thought?)
So if we have these educated people, they avoid crime, right? It's all too good to be true.
But as always, the difference between a low quality life and a high quality life is EDUCATION.
I have 3 hours until I hand in the worst essay I have ever written. Here's to passing!
Monday, October 26, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(276)
-
▼
October
(22)
- Methods
- Many possible words in many possible worlds!!!
- Existentialism's Guerrilla Philosophy: You are li...
- Portfolio 20: Diversify your Classes article
- Egads!-Begets-Vie Gehts?
- Determinism Objection
- Some mindless self-indulgence
- 1) I wish professors would say, "Memorize this an...
- Poetry Portfolio 2: Life and Bethany
- Poetry Portfolio 1: Machinations
- Take your passion and make it happen
- Technician Portfolio 19: Successful studying
- Comic Book Stories 2: The Hobgoblin, and a Discus...
- No one's laughing at GodNo one's laughing at GodNo...
- Some Bible Stories about Jacob the Patriarch
- Facade Saccade
- Portfolio 19 or 20
- Dumbo: wikipedia article, elaboration and discussion
- Facadesaside: Life changing moments?
- Kant to Skeptics: Drop Dead
- Tobias Wolff on Lying
- Slate articles about Lies
-
▼
October
(22)
No comments:
Post a Comment