In theory of knowledge last semester, we did Goldman's famous barn example.
It goes: suppose John and Dina are driving in the middle of Graceland, Tennessee, and John spots out a number of barns. They are all barns, except for one, which is only a movie-set prop of a barn front, or facade. In this way, it looks like a barn, but because he can only see the front, he does not know that it's not a barn.
He does know that there are other barns around (they are not facades). He points to the facade and, even though it is not a barn says, "Look at that barn."
Does John know that this a barn?
The example certainly implies no.
Showing posts with label knowledge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label knowledge. Show all posts
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(276)
-
▼
December
(23)
- Facadesaside has moved
- Be Free Now
- Wikipedia tells you what truth is: will you listen?
- Existentialism's Demon
- Some Useful Tautologies
- Discussing the Last Post's Article
- Barack "False Choices" Obama
- Pragmatism entails Traditionalism?
- More on the Philosophy of the Zodiac (Round 2)
- Hope and Change: The Placebo, the American Humbug...
- Philosophies of the Zodiac
- Beginnings and the Cosmological Argument
- Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Motivation
- Comic Book Philosophy (Part 3)
- It's impossible
- German Idealists: Georg Hegel
- David Denby's Past Shock
- Thing about Baby Logic
- The Law of Identity and the Law of Substitution
- You look good to me by Oscar Peterson
- Operational Definition of Philosophy, and some pro...
- Slate: Rosenbaum on how we haven't solved 3 big m...
- Some more Philosphical Musings
-
▼
December
(23)